Skip to main content

Molecular epidemiological analysis of Influenza viruses in Influenza-like illness cases: a retrospective study in Chongqing Hi-Tech Zone, China (2021–2024)

Abstract

Objectives

To analyze the molecular epidemiological characteristics of influenza viruses in influenza-like cases in Chongqing Hi-Tech Zone, China, to provide data support and a scientific basis for optimizing influenza prevention and control strategies in the region.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the molecular epidemiological characteristics of influenza viruses in influenza-like cases at a hospital in Chongqing Hi-Tech Zone from 2021 to 2024. Colloidal gold detection of viral antibodies, fluorescent PCR detection of nucleic acids, and gene sequencing were used to identify the different subtypes.

Results

Among 39,986 ILI specimens tested using the immunocolloid gold method, 6,616 influenza viruses were detected, with a detection rate of 16.54%. Infections included 4,464 influenza A viruses (67.50%), 2,033 influenza B viruses (30.73%), and 119 co-infections of influenza A and B viruses (1.77%).In this region, H3N2 was the predominant subtype of influenza A, and Victoria was the main subtype of influenza B.

Conclusion

Influenza epidemics in the winter and spring seasons in Chongqing Hi-Tech Zone were predominantly caused by influenza A, with influenza B also circulating. Influenza A strains were mainly H3N2, while influenza B strains were primarily Victoria.

Background

Influenza is a pandemic respiratory pathogen from the Orthomyxoviridae family, which can infect humans or other animals [1]. Due to its frequent genetic variation, the antigenicity of pandemic strains often changes annually, posing challenges for vaccine preparation and influenza surveillance. Influenza viruses are classified into four types: A, B, C, and D, based on antigenic differences in their nucleocapsid and nucleoprotein antigens [2]. Among these, influenza A subtypes (H1N1 and H3N2) and influenza B are known as seasonal influenza because they can circulate among populations throughout the year [3]. Influenza epidemics are often associated with significant economic and social burdens [4], making networked surveillance a crucial tool for preventing and controlling pandemics [5]. The World Health Organization analyzes laboratory surveillance data from global influenza surveillance networks annually and recommends vaccine strains for the subsequent year’s vaccine preparation [6,7,8,9].

Serum amyloid A (SAA) is an inflammation marker that has garnered significant attention recently [10,11,12,13]. SAA levels can rapidly and markedly increase following infection, inflammation, or tissue injury, making it valuable for the early diagnosis of infectious diseases, risk assessment, evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis determination. The elevation of SAA due to viral infections suggests its potential role in diagnosing influenza A and B [14,15,16,17,18].

This study aims to explore the molecular epidemiological characteristics of influenza viruses in influenza-like cases in Chongqing Hi-Tech Zone from 2021 to 2024. By monitoring and analyzing these cases, the research assesses the potential of inflammatory markers, such as SAA and C-reactive protein (CRP), for use in influenza diagnosis. The findings provide a scientific basis for improving influenza prevention and control strategies in the region and across the country, ultimately helping to mitigate the impact of influenza on public health.

Materials and methods

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of influenza-like illness (ILI) cases in a hospital in Chongqing Hi-Tech Zone, China, from 2021 to 2024. Inclusion criteria were based on the National Influenza Surveillance Programme (2017 version), requiring cases to meet the following conditions: body temperature ≥ 38 °C with symptoms of acute respiratory infection such as cough, sore throat, or sputum. Some cases may exhibit mild symptoms or no fever; physical examinations typically revealed enlarged tonsils and pharyngeal congestion. All cases required signed informed consent and were reviewed and approved by the hospital ethics committee.

We screened cases from the hospital’s electronic medical record system that met the ILI definition. Exclusion criteria included non-acute respiratory infectious diseases, known non-influenza viral respiratory diseases, and cases lacking necessary clinical and laboratory data. Additionally, basic patient information such as age, gender, occupation, and place of residence was collected to facilitate subsequent data analysis.

Detection methods

Pharyngeal swabs and sputum samples were collected using sterile swabs. These samples were promptly sent to the laboratory for testing immediately after collection. The colloidal gold method was used to detect viral antibodies, which demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity when compared to real-time RT-PCR, indicating its potential as a reliable screening tool in clinical settings [19, 20].And the fluorescent PCR method was employed to detect nucleic acids(Shanghai Hongshi Automatic Nucleic Acid Analysis System SLAN96P).Gene sequencing was utilized to identify different subtypes.

Statistical processing

“ Prior to statistical analysis, the measured data were subjected to a variance chi-square test. Parametric tests were employed for data that satisfied the criteria for normal distribution, while non-parametric tests were utilized for all count data.”All data were analyzed utilizing SPSS version 22.0 statistical software. The research results were organized to ensure the logic and completeness of data screening. Descriptive statistics, such as mean ± standard deviation (x‾±s), were used for continuous data, while frequency and percentage were used for categorical data.

Comparisons between groups for count data were performed utilizing the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact probability method. Comparisons between groups for continuous data were performed utilizing the t-test or ANOVA. A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders among the independent variables. The correlation between inflammatory indicators, such as SAA and CRP, and influenza virus infection was analyzed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of these indicators for influenza. Further statistical analysis was conducted to provide a more accurate assessment of these relationships.

Results

Influenza virus test results

A total of 39,986 ILI specimens were tested using the fluorescent PCR methods, detecting 6,616 influenza viruses, resulting in a detection rate of 16.54%. Among these, 4,464 (67.50%) were influenza A viruses, 2,033 (30.73%) were influenza B viruses, and 119 (1.77%) were simultaneous detections of both influenza A and B viruses, as shown in Table 1.

From November 2021 to September 2022, the peak detection of the influenza A virus occurred in January 2022, while the peak detection of the influenza B virus occurred in April 2022. From July 2022 to March 2023, the peak detection of influenza A virus occurred in December 2022, and the peak detection of influenza B virus occurred in January 2023. Notably, the peak of influenza B virus detection lagged behind that of influenza A (Fig. 1).

Table 1 Influenza virus test results of ILI specimens
Fig. 1
figure 1

Temporal distribution of influenza virus epidemics

H1N1 and H2N2 type test results

The positive cases were submitted for second-generation sequencing in order to ascertain the specific type of virus involved.From April 2023 to April 2024, H3N2 was the predominant subtype of influenza A, while Victoria was the main subtype of influenza B. The H1 subtype of influenza A was absent throughout 2023 but accounted for 82% of detections in January 2024 and 16% in February 2024. The Yamagata subtype of influenza B was undetected from 2023 to 2024 (Table 2; Fig. 2).

Table 2 Influenza virus test results of ILI specimens (Subtype of the influenza virus )
Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage of influenza virus test results for ILI specimens

Data analysis of SAA and CRP levels in patients with influenza A and B

From April 2023 to April 2024, our hospital recorded 241 influenza A and 207 cases of influenza B. The differences in SAA and CRP levels between these groups were statistically significant (p = 0.000 and p = 0.001, respectively). SAA and CRP levels were significantly higher in the influenza A group compared to the influenza B group. The increase in SAA levels in the influenza A group was greater than in the influenza B group and higher than in healthy adults. These findings indicate a correlation between influenza positivity and elevated SAA levels (Table 3; Fig. 3).

Table 3 Comparison of SAA and CRP levels [M (P25, P75), mg/L] in patients with influenza A and B from April 2023 to April 2024
Fig. 3
figure 3

Ratio of SAA and CRP levels in patients with Stream A and Stream B from April 2023 to April 2024Comparison of data from [M(P25, P75), mg/L]

Comparison of the distribution of influenza viruses by gender in various age groups

The differences in influenza A virus detection rates among genders aged 0–10 years and 60–70 years were statistically significant. In the 0–10 age group, the detection rate for males was 17.34% compared to 14.35% for females (P < 0.05). In the 60–70 age group, the detection rate for males was 3.52% compared to 6.13% for females (P < 0.05). For influenza B virus, the detection rate in the 0–10 years age group was 7.34% for males compared to 6.13% for females, also statistically significant (P < 0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of the distribution of influenza viruses by age group and sex

Comparison of the distribution of influenza viruses by sex

Among the 32,930 ILI cases, 15,610 were male and 17,320 were female. The detection rates of influenza A and B viruses were higher in males (12.01% and 4.89%, respectively) compared to females (7.83% and 3.69%, respectively). These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05)(Table 5).

Table 5 Comparison of the distribution of influenza viruses by sex

Colloidal gold and fluorescent PCR results

A total of three hundred patients were randomly selected for testing using both colloidal gold and fluorescent PCR methods in parallel, resulting in 73 influenza virus cases, yielding a detection rate of 24.33%. Among these, 52 cases were influenza A virus (71.23%), and 21 cases were influenza B (28.77%). Using the immunocolloidal gold method to detect influenza virus antigens, 49 cases were detected, with a detection rate of 16.34%. The detection rate of influenza virus using the fluorescent PCR method was significantly higher than that of the immunocolloidal gold method (χ2 = 5.736, P = 0.004), as shown in Table 6.

Table 6 Results of colloidal gold and fluorescent PCR assays

Discussion

Surveillance of influenza samples in Chongqing High-Tech Zone revealed the molecular epidemiological characteristics of influenza virus strains, including detection rates and temporal variations of major genotypes. These findings contribute to understanding influenza virus transmission patterns and trends, support the iterative updating of influenza virus strains, and help predict transmission and pathogenicity, thus providing a scientific basis for public health decision-making [21,22,23,24].

Chongqing Hi-tech Zone has a strong population mobility, which increases the likelihood of influenza generation, prevalence, and dissemination. Therefore, monitoring the pathogenetic and epidemiological patterns of influenza in this area is particularly significant. This study analyzed all ILIs reported at Chongqing Hi-Tech Zone University Hospital from November 2021 to April 2024. Both influenza A and B peaked during the winter and spring seasons, with influenza B peaking later than influenza A. This finding is consistent with previous literature reports [25,26,27]. It can be concluded that influenza A predominantly dominates the epidemic season.

From April 2023 to April 2024, there were 241 positive cases of influenza A and 207 positive cases of influenza B. Among the influenza A cases, H3N2 was the predominant subtype, while Victoria was the main subtype for influenza B. The H1 subtype of influenza A was absent throughout 2023 but accounted for 82% of the cases in January 2024 and 16% in February 2024. The Yamagata subtype of influenza B did not appear from 2023 to 2024 [26]. The study found that children aged 0–10 years were affected by influenza. There was a statistically significant difference in the detection rates of influenza A and B viruses between males and females in this age group (p < 0.05) [28,29,30].

The SAA and CRP levels of 241 influenza A positive cases and 207 influenza B positive cases were analyzed, showing statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.000 for SAA and p = 0.001 for CRP). The CRP levels were 7.9 mg/L in the influenza A positive group and 18.7 mg/L in the influenza B positive group. The SAA levels in the influenza A positive group were significantly higher than in the influenza B positive group. The CRP level in the influenza A positive group was significantly higher than in the influenza B positive group. A correlation was found between influenza A and B positivity and elevated SAA levels, with influenza A positivity showing a stronger correlation with elevated SAA [31,32,33,34].

It was shown that inflammation markers were higher in influenza A than influenza B. Studies have shown that patients infected with influenza A exhibit a more pronounced inflammatory response compared to those with influenza B. For instance, a comparative study of severe and critical influenza B in children highlighted that while both types of influenza can lead to significant morbidity, the inflammatory markers associated with influenza A infections tend to be elevated [35]. Additionally, research on the cellular immunophenotype expression during influenza infections indicated that influenza A is associated with a higher fraction of certain immune cell types, such as CD14 + and CD4 + IL-17 A + cells, compared to influenza B [36].

Moreover, the differential ability of pandemic and seasonal H1N1 influenza A viruses to alter neutrophil function suggests that influenza A may provoke a more robust immune response, potentially leading to increased inflammation [36]. This is further supported by findings that show higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in patients with influenza A, which can contribute to the severity of the disease [37].

In the context of co-infections, it has been observed that influenza A infections are more likely to be complicated by secondary bacterial infections, which can exacerbate the inflammatory response and lead to worse clinical outcomes [38]. The overall immune response to influenza A, characterized by heightened inflammation, underscores the need for vigilant monitoring and management of patients infected with this virus [39].

The correlation between influenza A and B positivity and SAA elevation was notably strong. In summary, winter and spring influenza in Chongqing’s High-Tech Zone is predominantly caused by influenza A, though influenza B is also prevalent. Among the positive cases, H3N2 is the primary subtype for influenza A, while Victoria is the primary subtype for influenza B. Elevated SAA levels are correlated with both influenza A and B positivity.

Furthermore, developing and optimizing influenza prevention and control strategies is crucial for mitigating the impact of seasonal and pandemic influenza. Effective strategies must be informed by robust surveillance systems, vaccination programs, and public health interventions. For instance, the Global Influenza Strategy 2019–2030 emphasizes the need for improved surveillance and vaccination efforts in regions like Latin America and the Caribbean, where seasonal influenza is associated with significant morbidity and mortality [1].

Moreover, the application of mathematical models, such as the moving epidemic method, can help define epidemic thresholds and guide timely interventions. A study conducted in Tunisia demonstrated the utility of this method in determining influenza epidemic and intensity thresholds, which can inform local health authorities about when to implement control measures [2].

In addition to vaccination, nonpharmaceutical interventions play a vital role in controlling influenza transmission. A review of personal protective measures and environmental hygiene in nonhealthcare settings highlighted the importance of hand hygiene and the use of face masks, although evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests limited effectiveness in reducing transmission [3].

Although the study demonstrates the epidemiological characteristics of influenza virus infection and the potential application of inflammatory markers, several limitations exist. The limited sample size may restrict the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the study did not analyze the effect of different influenza A virus strains on the levels of 14 inflammatory markers or explore the potential influence of other respiratory pathogens on these markers.

Future studies will explore the mechanisms behind these epidemiological features to obtain more comprehensive and objective findings. Additionally, further research is needed on the expression patterns of inflammatory markers in different populations, such as children, the elderly, and patients with chronic diseases, and their role in the preventive mechanisms of influenza vaccination. As research deepens, a clearer understanding of the function and importance of the influenza vaccine and inflammatory markers will provide a solid theoretical basis for influenza prevention and treatment.

Conclusion

The winter and spring influenza virus epidemics in the High-Tech Zone of Chongqing Municipality, China, were dominated by influenza A, with influenza B circulating. The predominant strains were H3N2 for influenza A and Victoria for influenza B. This study provides important data and a scientific basis for developing and optimizing influenza prevention and control strategies in the region.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. HU R, Yan-Liang Zhang, Juan Zhang. Research progress of influenza A and B virus detection methods. Systemic Med 2023,8(2):178–182198.

  2. Wang Jiang Xu, Yi Chen, Junfeng, et al. Progress in laboratory detection of influenza virus. Chin J Hosp Infect. 2020;30(02):308–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petrova VN, Russell CA. The evolution of seasonal influenzaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(1):47–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhi-Ou FU, Chang-Jun B, Zhong-Jie LI, Li-Ping WANG, Yuan LI, Han-Bing L, Zhi-Xing PENG. Progress of influenza early warning research based on big data. Chin J Epidemiol 2020,41(6):975–80.

  5. Yu Juan, Li H, Rao HX, et al. Analysis of respiratory virus detection in nasopharyngeal secretions of 150 influenza-like cases negative for influenza virus nucleic acid during the high influenza season. Shandong Med. 2018;58(31):40–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Liping. Observations on influenza virus detection in different specimens of influenza-like cases using PCR and cell culture methods for comparison. Chin Med Sci. 2015;5(15):147–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Shilan Yang, Shengqin An, Zonghong Yang, Wencai Zhu, Qin. Analysis of influenza-like patients and influenza virus surveillance results. Chin J Hosp Infect 2018,28(16):2507–25092530.

  8. Liu N, Zhang LL, Zhao YM, et al. Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and detection methods of influenza A and B viruses in a hospital from 2016 to 2018. Lab Med Clin. 2019;16(02):184–186190.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu GY, Peng FS, Tu YP, et al. Epidemiological characterisation of influenza patients in a hospital in 2017–2020. China Mod Physician. 2021;59(19):152–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loonen CD, de Jager, et al. Biomarkers and Molecular Analysis to Improve Bloodstream Infection Diagnostics in an Emergency Care Unit. PLoS ONE; 2014.

  11. Wu J, Zhao KK, Liu F. Surveillance and analysis of patients with severe acute respiratory infections admitted to a tertiary hospital in Hefei City, Anhui Province, 2019–2021. Journal of practical clinical medicine,2023,27(7):118–23.

  12. Li Y, Fan Y et al. Aerosol and environmental surface monitoring for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a designated hospital for severe COVID-19 patients. Epidemiol Infect (2020).

  13. Guoyao XU, Fusong PENG, Yinping TU et al. Epidemiological characterisation of influenza patients in a hospital in 2017–2020. China Mod Physician 2021,59(19):152–5.

  14. Piralla E, Pariani et al. Molecular characterization of influenza strains in patients admitted to Intensive Care Units during the 2017–2018 season. Int J Mol Sci (2019).

  15. Juan YU, Hong LI, Huaxiang RAO, et al. Analysis of respiratory virus detection in nasopharyngeal secretions of 150 influenza-like cases negative for influenza virus nucleic acid during the high influenza season. Shandong Med. 2018;58(31):40–3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noh J, Song J et al. Viral load dynamics in adult patients with a(H1N1)pdm09 influenza. Epidemiol Infect (2013). 753–8.

  17. Fragkou P, Charalampos D, Moschopoulos et al. Update Viral Infections Intensive Care Unit Front Med (2021).

  18. Masahiro Watanabe S, Nukuzuma et al. Viral load and rapid diagnostic test in patients with pandemic H1N1 2009. Pediatr Int (2011).

  19. Li X, Chen H, Wei J, Lv N, You L. The evaluation of colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (GICA) for rapid diagnosis of influenza A disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(9):1533–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li W, Liu L, Chen L, Shang S. Evaluation of a Commercial Colloidal Gold Assay for detection of Influenza A and B Virus in Children’s respiratory specimens. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2020;39(2):93–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fang NING, Wei DUAN et al. Analysis of abnormal fluctuation and early warning of influenza-like illness surveillance system data. China Public Health, 2007(10):1210–1.

  22. Jill K, Baber, Michelle A, Feist. Utility of Outpatient Syndromic Data for Monitoring Influenza-like illness. Online J Public Health Inf (2017).

  23. Cantan B, Luyt C et al. Influenza Infections and emergent viral infections in Intensive Care Unit. Seminars in respiratory and critical Care Medicine (2019). 488–97.

  24. Kate R, Beard C, Chan et al. 654. Evaluation of the Febridx host response point-of-care test to differentiate viral from bacterial etiology in adults hospitalised with Acute respiratory illness during influenza season. Open Forum Infect Dis (2019). S300 - S301.

  25. Andrew Walsh. Enhancing Syndromic Surveillance with Procedure Data: a 2017-8 Influenza Case Study. Online J Public Health Inf (2019).

  26. LI Yao LIANG, Dingyuan MU, Yunsong et al. Analysis of Influenza A epidemic, prevention and control and its implications for the new Crown pneumonia epidemic. Environ Sci Res 2020,33(07):1562–70.

  27. Xing B, Li EC, Ying XY. Laboratory diagnosis and epidemiological trend analysis of influenza a virus in 2018–2019. Mod Practical Med 2020,32(05):515–7.

  28. He Yanjin. Analysis of adverse reactions and nursing effects of influenza vaccination in children of different ages. World Digest Recent Med Inform 2018,18(77):–250.

  29. Luca T, Giurgea A, Cervantes-Medina et al. Sex differences in Influenza: the challenge study experience. J Infect Dis (2021).

  30. Daoli LIU, Huajing LONG, Yang XIA et al. Comparison of leukocyte classification and clinical characterisation of influenza A and B patients. Int J Lab Med 2017,38(13):1740–2.

  31. Wang-Zhan ZHOU, Wei HE, Yun-Shuang HU. Analysis of differences in clinical symptoms, white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein between patients with influenza A and influenza B. Chin J Health Inspection 2021,31(10):1215–8.

  32. Runan ZHU, Yuan QIAN, Chenggui LIU et al. Identification of influenza A and B virus infections by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Chin J Paediatrics,2000(09):7–10.

  33. Zhonghua QIN, Xiaomei SONG, Yanqing DU et al. Analysis of the clinical value of serum SAA/CRP and CD64 for early diagnosis of influenza A in children. China Maternal Child Health 2020,35(01):61–4.

  34. Jianmin YANG, Hui YE. ZHANG Hong.Differential diagnostic value of CRP and SAA in upper respiratory tract infections in children. Lab Med. 2016;31(08):679–80.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Avni T, Babich T, Nir A, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of influenza A and B at the 2017–2018 influenza season: a cohort study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(6):1109–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Shen CF, Ho TS, Wang SM, et al. The cellular immunophenotype expression of influenza a virus and influenza B virus infection in children. Clin Immunol. 2020;219:108548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Othumpangat S, Lindsley WG, Beezhold DH, et al. Differential expression of serum exosome microRNAs and cytokines in Influenza A and B patients Collected in the 2016 and 2017 Influenza Seasons. Pathogens. 2021;10(2):149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Li P, Liu X, Lang Y, Cui X, Shi Y. A comparative study of severe and critical influenza B in children in the 2021–2022 winter season. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15:7995–8001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Keilich SR, Bartley JM, Haynes L. Diminished immune responses with aging predispose older adults to common and uncommon influenza complications. Cell Immunol. 2019;345:103992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (KJQN202000443); the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023MD734129).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.C. and Y. H.D. Conceived the manuscript. W.C. and Y. H.D. wrote the draft manuscript. P.X. curated the data and prepared the figures and tables. J.J.X. critically read and edited the manuscript. P.X. curated the data and prepared the figures and tables. J.J.X. critically read and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianjiang Xue.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, W., Deng, Y., Xu, P. et al. Molecular epidemiological analysis of Influenza viruses in Influenza-like illness cases: a retrospective study in Chongqing Hi-Tech Zone, China (2021–2024). Virol J 21, 340 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12985-024-02594-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12985-024-02594-6

Keywords